In “Allons-y, Part 6 of Time
Incorporated: The Doctor Who Fanzine Archives: Vol. 3: Writings on the New Series
(Mad Norwegian Press 2011), writer Lloyd Rose celebrates John Simm’s Master
in “Re-Mastered.” From reading online message boards, I often see fans slagging
off Simm’s interpretation of the Master, which I have always held to be
diabolically brilliant. Rose’s positive reading of Simm’s interpretation of the
Master thus reinforces my defense and adoration for his performance. He also
points out the act of creative synergy taking place between writer Russell T
Davies and Simm: “Forget whatever’s going on between the Master and the Doctor.
This is the real story, the romance between writer and actor, a fusion of
shared exploration and delight” (180). As I said in my second blog on Convergence Culture, academic criticism
for an object of study does not always have to be critical. In the case of fan criticism toward an object of affection,
this truth doubly holds its weight. And for me, who wishes to hone his skill as
a fan cultures scholar, this rule is triply true, as I need to remember to
fairly assess fans even if I do not agree with their critical views or
obsessive love for their sacred idols and stories.
For Part 7: “The 21st Century is When It All
Happens,” which centers on the two Doctor
Who spinoff series, Torchwood and
The Sarah Jane Adventures, I have
mixed feelings. It is not that the articles presented in this section of the
book are not interesting; I just wish they could have been organized into a
separate volume of Time Unincorporated dealing
with ancillary series as the collection to this point contained a certain sense
of momentum in commenting on the mother show. Nonetheless, I was quite
impressed by Helen Kang’s contribution to this volume, “Death, Corpses and
Un-Death in Torchwood.” Taking Owen
Harper’s death and subsequent “living dead” resurrection as a sentient, walking
corpse in the second series of Torchwood
as her cue, Kang intriguingly weaves in Michel Foucault’s Birth of the Clinic, particularly his ideas concerning pathological
anatomy, where a corpse tells the story of the deceased individual’s life
(206).
What I like about Kang’s approach is that she’s writing for Torchwood fans, but also for the
academic crowd, a strategy which my co-author Marc Schuster and I similarly employed
for our ruminations on Doctor Who in The Greatest Show in the Galaxy: The
Discerning Fan’s Guide to Doctor Who (McFarland 2007). Now that I am older,
a little wiser, and heading toward my comprehensive exams and dissertation in
the next few years for a Ph.D. in Literature and Criticism, I am reminded that
this attitude is still a valid one, as it achieves a twofold success in
appealing to the erudite fan and serious scholar alike. Thus, regardless of
whether or not I’m talking about feminist Doctor
Who fans, aging comic-book readers, people who join in group zombie strolls,
tween science-fiction readers, devoted Star
Wars lovers, or cross-cultural anime fandom, I can still incorporate the
theories of such thinkers as Marx, Haraway, Bourdieu, and any other so-called
“heavy” intellectual when I am writing with a multilayered audience in mind.
In understanding how fans express their appreciation – or
the converse – for producer / head writers Russell T Davies and Steven Moffat,
one should look at how these two men approach writing Doctor Who. Scott Clarke tackles this subject in “A Tale of Two Writers”
in Part 8 of this volume, “Wibbly-Wobbly…”
With one line, Clarke’s adroitly articulates Davies and Moffat’s divergent
mythology-arc structuring of their Doctor
Who seasons: “To be completely stark: a Davies arc is a portent of doom in
the background of escalating character crisis; a Moffat arc is like an
elaborate mousetrap that the characters have to react to and find their way out
of” (233). In interviews, both writers often discuss growing up with Doctor Who and practicing a lifelong
love of the series, in front of the television as a fan and behind the writer’s
desk as a professional. Their respective mythology-arc strategies form a
synthesis of their Doctor Who viewing
experiences and their understanding about modern television, which has resulted
in successful new televised adventures for a certain two-hearted alien and his antiquated
time machine.
Part 9, “Bowties are Cool,” repeats what Part 1 of this
volume accomplished: It presents fan-love for the incumbent Time Lord, in this
case, Matt Smith, who plays the eleventh incarnation of the Doctor. Graeme
Burke’s contribution to this section, “Dear Matt Smith,” is one specific
standout since it proffers a fan’s perspective on the act of assuming the
venerated role of the Doctor to Mr. Smith, who, at the time of Burke’s article,
would not debut on BBC screens as the Eleventh Doctor for over a year. Burke wisely warns Smith that Doctor Who fans will dissect every
aspect of the show’s production, which involves casting, characters,
storylines, and even the briefest of interviews. He adds to Smith, “With that
passion – and the principle holds true for fans of football, baseball, and
theatre – fans can develop an incredible sense of enthusiasm, that we are
personally owed something by you” (273). Although Burke proceeds to tell Smith
to just apply his best acting to the role of the Doctor, the darker vision of
his words remains with me. This shadowy
and sometimes disturbing underbelly of Doctor
Who – and practically any other type of fandom – is not the most appealing
variety of subject matter, but it is one I must address in the future as I
explore different modules of fan communities. I guess what I am saying is that,
in returning to the subject of obsessive fans, I am going to have to take both
a clinical and empathetic intellectual stance in delving into their oftentimes complicated,
troubled, and contradictory mindsets…
It's funny... Every time I see the phrase "Behind the..." in relation to Doctor Who fans, I always expect the next word to be "couch." I'm glad to see it was "writer's desk" this time around. Much more original!
ReplyDelete